Professor Caroline Mala Corbin’s recent article was cited by the U.S. district court, district of New Hampshire, in a ruling that the state's critical race theory ban was unconstitutional. The article, A Critical Race Theory Analysis of Critical Race Theory Bans, applies a CRT analysis to these CRT bans, finding that the bans embody white privilege and especially its companion, white fragility.
Corbin teaches U.S. Constitutional Law I, U.S. Constitutional Law II, First Amendment, the Religion Clauses, the Free Speech Clause, Feminism and the First Amendment, and Advanced Topics in Reproductive Rights. Her scholarship focuses on the First Amendment’s speech and religion clauses, particularly their intersection with equality issues.
Corbin’s articles have been published in the New York University Law Review, UCLA Law Review, Northwestern University Law Review, Boston University Law Review, and Emory Law Journal, among others. Her writing has also appeared in the online editions of the Harvard Law Review, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Michigan Law Review, California Law Review, and Virginia Law Review.